Abstract
Purpose
The paper aims to determine the rational hom*otopy type of the total space of projectivized bundles over complex projective spaces using Sullivan minimal models, providing insights into the algebraic structure of these spaces.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper utilises techniques from Sullivan’s theory of minimal models to analyse the differential graded algebraic structure of projectivized bundles. It employs algebraic methods to compute the Sullivan minimal model of and establish relationships with the base space.
Findings
The paper determines the rational hom*otopy type of projectivized bundles over complex projective spaces. Of great interest is how the Chern classes of the fibre space and base space, play a critical role in determining the Sullivan model of P(E). We also provide the hom*ogeneous space of P(E) when n=2. Finally, we prove the formality of P(E) over a hom*ogeneous space of equal rank.
Research limitations/implications
Limitations may include the complexity of computing minimal models for higher-dimensional bundles.
Practical implications
Understanding the rational hom*otopy type of projectivized bundles facilitates computations in algebraic topology and differential geometry, potentially aiding in applications such as topological data analysis and geometric modelling.
Social implications
While the direct social impact may be indirect, advancements in algebraic topology contribute to broader mathematical knowledge, which can underpin developments in science, engineering, and technology with societal benefits.
Originality/value
The paper’s originality lies in its application of Sullivan minimal models to determine the rational hom*otopy type of projectivized bundles over complex projective spaces, offering valuable insights into the algebraic structure of these spaces and their associated complex vector bundles.
Keywords
- Projectivization bundle
- Sullivan minimal models
- Formality
- Complex manifolds
- Primary 55P62
Citation
Gastinzi, J.B. and Ndlovu, M. (2024), "Rational hom*otopy type of projectivization of the tangent bundle of certain spaces", Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJMS-02-2024-0029
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024, Jean Baptiste Gastinzi and Meshach Ndlovu
License
Published in the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
This section will outline the fundamental concepts and definitions of differential graded algebras. We consider a setting where all algebras and vector spaces are taken over the field of rational numbers. The primary reference for the definitions in this paper is [1].
Definition 1.1.
A graded algebra is a graded vector space A=⊕p≥0Ap together with an associative multiplication of degree zero:
such that there is an identity 1 ∈ A0. A graded algebra is called commutative (cga) if
If V is a graded vector space, then the free commutative graded algebra ΛV is defined by ΛV = S(Veven) ⊗ E(Vodd), where S(Veven) is the symmetric algebra and E(Vodd) is the exterior algebra. If {v1, v2, ⋯ } is a basis of V, then ΛV is often written as Λ(v1, v2, ⋯).
Definition 1.2.
Let be the cochain algebra of the normalized singular cochains on a topological space X. Sullivan defines a cdga of polynomial forms on X, with natural cochain algebra quasi-isomorphisms
where D(X) is a third natural cochain algebra [2, §10]. Moreover, is a contravariant functor from the category of topological spaces to a category of cdgas.
Definition 1.3.
A commutative cochain algebra (ΛV, d) is called a Sullivan algebra if
such that, d=0 in V(0) and d: V(k)=ΛV(k−1), k≥1. Moreover, a Sullivan algebra (ΛV, d) is called minimal if dV ⊂ Λ≥2V. Let (A, d) be a cdga with , there always exists a quasi-isomorphism m: (ΛV, d) → (A, d), where (ΛV, d) is a Sullivan algebra. A cdga map φ: (A, d) → (B, d) is a quasi-isomorphism if is an isomorphism.
Definition 1.4.
Consider the cdga Λ(t, dt), where |t|=0, |dt|=1 and d(t)=dt. There are augmentation maps , where ɛ0(t)=0 and ɛ1(t)=1. Two cdga maps ϕ0, ϕ1: (ΛV, d) → (B, d) are hom*otopic (i.e. ϕ0≃ϕ1) if there exists a cdga map Φ: (ΛV, d) → B ⊗Λ(t, dt) such that (1 ⊗ ɛi)◦Φ=ϕi [2, §12].
Definition 1.5.
[1, §2] Let X be a path-connected space. The Sullivan minimal model of X is the Sullivan minimal model of APL(X). If f: X → Y is a map between path-connected spaces, the minimal model of APL(f) is called the Sullivan minimal model of f.
Let φ: (A, d) → (B, d) be a map of cdga’s, and mA: (ΛV, d) → (A, d) and mB: (ΛW, d) → (B, d) be the Sullivan models. Then there exists a morphism of cdga’s g: (ΛV, d) → (ΛW, d) that is unique up to hom*otopy, such that mB◦g≃φ◦mA is called the Sullivan minimal model of φ.
Definition 1.6.
A Sullivan minimal algebra (ΛV, d) is said to be formal if there exists a hom*omorphism ϕ: (ΛV, d) → H *(ΛV, d) inducing an isomorphism on cohom*ology. A space X is said to be formal if its minimal model is formal.
Definition 1.7.
A relative Sullivan model of a morphism of commutative differential graded algebras φ: (A, d) → (B, d) is a morphism and V=∪k≥0V(k), where V(0) ⊂ V(1) ⊂ ⋯ is an increasing sequence with d(V(0)) ⊆ A and dV(k) ⊆ A ⊗ V(k−1), k≥1 and there is a quasi isomorphism ψ: (A ⊗ΛV, d) → (B, d) such that ψ◦i=φ.
Let be a fibration between simply connected spaces, then there exists a relative Sullivan model (ΛV, d) → (ΛV ⊗ΛW, D) → (ΛW, d), where (ΛV, d) and (ΛW, d) are respective Sullivan models of B and F. Moreover, (ΛV ⊗ΛW, D) is a Sullivan model of E, not necessarily minimal [3, §12].
Definition 1.8.
Let Q be a finite-dimensional graded vector space concentrated in even degrees. A regular sequence is defined as an ordered set of elements u1, …, um belonging to Λ+Q such that u1 is not a zero divisor in ΛQ, and for i≥2, then the image of ui is likewise not a zero divisor in the quotient graded algebra ΛQ/(u1, …, ui−1). In particular, any given sequence of the form u1, …, um can be used to define a pure Sullivan algebra denoted as (ΛQ ⊗ΛP, d), for ΛP=Λ(x1, …, xm), where the differential operator is defined by dxi=ui [2, p.437, 4 p. 157].
Definition 1.9.
[1, p. 188] A closed manifold (M2n, ω) is cohom*ologically symplectic (or c-symplectic) if there is such that ωn ≠ 0.
2. Model of the projectivization of a complex bundle
A projectivized bundle is constructed by replacing each fibre of a complex vecto bundle with the corresponding projective space. Specifically, let
(1)
The cohom*ology algebra of the total space P(E) is given by
Theorem 2.1.
Let be a complex fibre bundle and P(π) its projectivization. If (A, d) is a cdga model of B, then a model of the total space of P(π) is given by (A ⊗ Λ(x2n, x2n−1), D), and represent the Chern classes of π.
Proof
If B is a complex manifold and π corresponds to the tangent bundle, the structure group of the complex vector bundle can be reduced to U(n). Moreover, the structural group of P(π) reduces to U(n)/S1 ≅ PU(n), where S1 is considered as a subgroup of U(n) under the identification
As BPU(n) has the rational hom*otopy type SU(n), a Sullivan model of BPU(n) is given by (Λ(y4, ⋯y2n), 0), and a model of f is ϕ: (Λ(y4, ⋯y2n), 0) → (A, d) with Chern classes [ci]=ϕ(y2i)∈H2i(A, d), for i={1, 2, …, n}. A relative model of projectivization is then given by,
with
3. Projectivization and tangent sphere bundles over complex manifolds
For a complex vector bundle π: E → B2n let the unit tangent sphere bundle be denoted by S2n−1 → S(E) → B2n. Also, the complex structure on E implies that the circle S1 acts on the sphere bundle. Therefore, there exists a bundle map ζ: S(E) → P(E).
A model for the unit sphere bundle is given by (A ⊗ Λv2n−1, D), where D|A=d, Dv2n−1=w, where w is a cocycle that represents the fundamental class of B [9]. The following diagram of cdga’s commutes:
where, q(x2)=0 and q(x2n−1)=v2n−1.
Theorem 3.1.
Consider the fibration of the unit tangent sphere bundle over a complex projective space and the projectivization fibration over ,
then yields , for i≥3.
Proof: If is a tanget bundle and y2 a generater of , then the Chern classes are given by , i=1, 2, …, n up to a non-zero rational factor (see [4, §21]). Given that the Sullivan model of P(E) is (Λ(y2, y2n+1) ⊗ Λ(x2, x2n−1), d) with dy2=dx2=0, , and . Also a model of the sphere bundle S(E) is given by the Sullivan model (Λ(y2, y2n+1) ⊗ Λv2n−1, d), with dy2=0, and . The Sullivan model of ζ is
The dual hom*otopy groups generated by and . The restriction of q to the algebra generators yields
Theorem 3.2.
The rational hom*otopy type of the total space P(E) of the projectivized bundle
is that of the hom*ogeneous space U(3)/U(1) × U(1) × U(1).
Proof: Consider the projectivization fibration . The Sullivan model of the total space P(E) is given by
Now, consider the hom*ogeneous space G/H where G=U(3) and H = U(1) × U(1) × U(1).
Let j: H = U(1) × U(1) × U(1) ↪ G=U(3) the inclusion, and Bj: BH → BG the classifying map. Then G/H is the hom*otopy pullback of the following diagram:
A Sullivan model for G/H is
where
The map f: (Λ(a2, b2, w3, w5), d) → (Λ(x2, y2, x3, y5), d), with f(a2)=x2, f(w3)=x3,
f(b2)=y2, f(w5)=y2x3−y5 is a quasi-isomorphism. Therefore, P(E) has the rational hom*otopy type of U(3)/U(1) × U(1) × U(1).
Proposition 3.3.
Consider a non-trivial complex vector bundle and the projectivization of vector bundle
Then P(E) has a rational hom*otopy type of , for n≥2.
Proof:
The Sullivan minimal model of S2n is (Λ(a2n, b4n−1), d) with da2=0, and . Again, the Sullivan minimal model of is Λ(x2, x2n−1) with dx2=0, and . Therefore, the KS model of π;
Then, the total space P(E) of the projectivized bundle has a Sullivan model,
Making the change of variables to eliminate the linear part, let . Then we get an isomorphic cdga
As the ideal (x2n−1, t2n) is acyclic, the minimal Sullivan model of P(E) is,
Hence P(E), has a rational hom*otopy type of .
Remark: As , then P(E) satisfies the hard Lefschetz property (See Theorem 3.1 in Ref.[6]).
Theorem 3.4.
([4, p. 149, 6], Theorem 4.1). Let M be a simply connected smooth manifold of dimension 2n. Given a fibration
then E is formal if and only if M is formal.
The proof of this Theorem 3.4 is given in Refs. [4, 11]. We give here a simple proof of a particular case of this theorem.
Theorem 3.5.
If B is a hom*ogenous space of equal rank with a complex structure of dimension n, and is the complex vector bundle, then in the projectivization bundle
have a formal total space P(E).
Proof:
Let B be a hom*ogeneous space of equal rank, implying the existence of a pure model
Let ui=dvi we show that (u1, …, um, dx2n−1) forms a regular sequence in Λ(y1, …, ym, x2). It suffices to show that
(2)
References
1Félix Y, Oprea J, Tanré D. Algebraic models in geometry. In: Graduate texts in Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008; 17.
2Félix Y, Halperin S, Thomas J-C. Rational hom*otopy theory. In: Graduate texts in Mathematics. Springer Science + Business Media; 2001; 205.
3Félix Y, Halperin S. Rational hom*otopy theory via sullivan models: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.05245. 2017; 5(2): 14-36. doi: 10.4310/iccm.2017.v5.n2.a3.
4Tralle A, Oprea J. Symplectic manifolds with no Kähler structure. In: Lecture notes in Mathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1997; 1661.
5Bott R, Tu LW. Differential forms in algebraic topology. In: Graduate texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 1982; 82.
6Nishinobu H, Yamaguchi T. The Lefschetz condition on projectivizations of complex vector bundles. Commun Korean Math Soc. 2014; 29(4): 569-79. doi: 10.4134/ckms.2014.29.4.569.
7Gatsinzi JB. On the genus of elliptic fibrations. Proc Am Math Soc. 2004; 132(2): 597-606. doi: 10.1090/s0002-9939-03-07203-4.
8Sullivan D. Infinitesimal computations in topology. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS. 1977; 47(1): 269-331. doi: 10.1007/bf02684341.
9Banyaga A, Gatsinzi JB, Massamba F. A note on the formality of some contact manifolds. J Geometry. 2018; 109: 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00022-018-0409-3.
10Lambrechts P, Stanley D. Examples of rational hom*otopy types of blow-ups. Proc Am Math Soc. 2005; 133(12): 3713-19. doi: 10.1090/s0002-9939-05-07750-6.
11Lupton G, Oprea J. Symplectic manifolds and formality. J Pure Appl Algebra. 1994; 91(1-3): 193-207. doi: 10.1016/0022-4049(94)90142-2.
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on a part of Ndlovu’s Ph.D. thesis carried out under Gatsinzi’s supervision. We leveraged language editing by utilizing ChatGPT.
Corresponding author
Meshach Ndlovu can be contacted at: nm21100072@studentmail.biust.ac.bw